Monday, 11 June 2012
London: Only those British nationals or residents with an
annual income of at least Rs 16 lakhs will be able to bring spouses from the
Indian sub-continent and other countries outside the European Union from July
9, the government announced on Sunday.
The new restrictions are part of the David Cameron
government's efforts to reduce migration from outside the EU. The curbs on
non-EU spouses are also intended to clamp down on bogus marriages and family
visas, with migrants ending up on benefits from the taxpayer.
Home secretary Theresa May on Sunday said: "Like the
rest of the immigration system, family visas have not been regulated properly
for years."
"There have been sham marriages, people have been
allowed to come to Britain without being able to speak English and there
haven't been rules in place to stop people becoming a burden on the welfare
state," she said.
"We're changing all of that. Our plans mean the
thousands of people who wish to bring their foreign spouses, partners and
dependants to live with them here in Britain will have to have sufficient
financial independence to be able to support them without becoming a burden to
the taxpayer," she added.
Theresa May, the Home Secretary, is planning a major
immigration crackdown on tens of thousands of people who "abuse"
family visas to settle in Britain, according to a leaked cabinet letter. The
letter from Mrs May to Nick Clegg, which has been seen by The Sunday Telegraph,
proposes a tough new minimum income of £25,700 a year for anyone seeking to
bring a spouse, partner or dependant to the UK from outside the European Union
from June - almost double the current threshold of £13,700. The minimum income
would rise dramatically - up to £62,600 - if children are also brought in.
Mrs May also wants a longer probationary period of five
years before spouses and partners can apply to live permanently in Britain, and
a higher level of English to be required. The proposals could cut the number of
immigrants allowed in by 15,000 a year - a significant step towards the
Government's aim of reducing "net" migration to 100,000 people each
year. However, they are expected to fought hard by Mr Clegg and other Liberal
Democrat ministers, escalating still further the tensions between the two
Coalition partners that have risen dramatically since last week's controversial
Budget.
On the controversial issue of foreign criminals being
prevented from deportation on human rights grounds, May said she would be
seeking the backing of Parliament for new guidelines for the courts spelling
out how they should apply the European Convention on Human Rights in such
cases.
Besides the income threshold, other curbs include a
longer period, from two to five years, before the non-EU spouse can be granted
permanent settlement.
Sponsor of a non-EU spouse, will have to earn at least
18,600 pounds (nearly Rs 16 lakhs) a year and if they have a child the
threshold will rise to 22,400 pounds, rising by 2,400 pounds for each
additional child.
"I think it is important that if people are bringing
people into the UK to create a family here in the UK that we say that you
should be able to support yourselves and not be reliant on the state," May
said.
Any British citizen or an individual with resident status
will also have to sign a five-year undertaking that they can "maintain,
accommodate and care" for their elderly non-EU relatives without access to
public funds such as carer and disability allowances, housing and council tax
benefits and winter fuel and cold weather payments.
The new restrictions have already drawn criticism from
human rights groups, and the Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants
(JCWI), who see the curbs as an attack on the right of migrants to family life.
Shami Chakrabarti, director of the human rights group
Liberty, said: "Given the toxic nature of immigration politics in a
recession, it becomes especially important to distinguish between abuse and
criminality and anything that splits up genuine innocent families of British
nationals."
"Any income based assessment of this kind
automatically discriminates against women, retired people, disabled people, the
young and many minority ethnic people," JCWI said.
"It is well known that pension levels and wages for
these people are proven to be lower than average in the UK," it added.
0 comments:
Post a Comment